How is a building plan assessed against the Bbl and the omgevingsplan?

Short answer: A permit-requiring technische bouwactiviteit is assessed against the Bbl (technical) and, where relevant, the omgevingsplan (spatial) and welstand criteria (spatial quality). These reviews run largely independently: a plan can be technically sound and still spatially non-compliant, or the reverse.

The two-layer assessment framework

1. Technical review (Bbl) — does the plan meet the requirements for the relevant use function and level (new build/renovation)? This covers structural safety, fire safety, daylight, ventilation and energy performance, among others.

2. Spatial review (omgevingsplan) — does the plan fit within the bouwvlak, the maximum heights, the building coverage percentage, and the permitted use at that location?

Common points of conflict

• Conflict with the Bbl — insufficient daylight surface, an escape route that's too narrow, or missing substantiation for an equivalent solution.

• Conflict with the omgevingsplan — building outside the bouwvlak, a ridge height above the permitted maximum, or a use not allowed at that location (requiring a BOPA).

Permit conditions

When granting a permit, a municipality can attach conditions — a requirement for further investigation, a specific construction method, or a deadline by which construction must start. These conditions form part of the permit and are enforceable.

Related pages

• What Is the Bbl?

• The Omgevingsplan Explained

• What Do You Need for a Permit Application?

Struck gives municipal officers a sourced, cited assessment recommendation for any building plan in seconds